Can You Sue a Consumer Product Manufacturer for an Allergic Reaction?

a woman sitting on a couch looking at her cell phone
Photo by Bermix Studio on Unsplash

When a product triggers an allergic reaction, the path to legal action isn't always straightforward. While consumers have the right to seek compensation for injuries caused by defective products, allergic reactions present unique challenges in product liability law.

The key question often centers on whether the manufacturer adequately warned consumers about potential allergens and fulfilled their duty of care. In this article, we will explore the legal options available to consumers who experience allergic reactions.

Consumer Product Allergies: Common Reactions and Triggers

Allergic reactions to consumer products typically present in two main ways - skin reactions and respiratory reactions. Skin reactions may include contact dermatitis with symptoms like rashes, redness, and itching, along with hives, swelling, and eczema flare-ups.

Respiratory reactions manifest as sneezing, a runny or stuffy nose, coughing, wheezing, and, in severe cases, difficulty breathing.

Common Triggers By Product Category

Understanding these categories and their potential allergens is key to preventing adverse reactions.

Take this case of a fatal reaction from hair relaxer products. Hair straighteners and relaxers have come under legal scrutiny for their serious effects.

Boston University's Black Women's Health Study highlights a significant health risk for postmenopausal Black women. Those who frequently use chemical hair relaxers more than twice a year or for long periods exceeding five years face increased risks. Their likelihood of developing uterine cancer is over 50% higher compared to non-users.

Dr. Kimberly Bertrand highlights that Black women are at greater risk of developing aggressive types of uterine cancer. They also face nearly double the mortality rate compared to non-Hispanic white women. This alarming issue has sparked numerous legal actions, including hair relaxer lawsuits.

TorHoerman Law states that these lawsuits have been filed in multidistrict litigation in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. MDL cases are settled individually, as opposed to class-action lawsuits, which have settlements split equitably among plaintiffs.

Each claim is evaluated based on the plaintiff's individual circumstances, and compensation is determined appropriately.

When Can You Get Compensation for a Product-Induced Allergy?

If you have an adverse response caused by a product, you can be eligible for compensation. This is typically based on legal principles related to negligence and consumer protection laws.

Here’s a detailed overview of when you can seek compensation for a product-induced allergy:

A Failure to Warn (Negligence)

While allergies are typically inherent or develop naturally, entities can be held liable for allergic reactions caused by negligence.

Laws like the Food Allergen Labeling and Consumer Protection Act (FALCPA) of 2004 require companies to label products that contain serious allergies. Foods that trigger allergies include milk, eggs, fish, shellfish, tree nuts, peanuts, wheat, and soybeans.

The FASTER Act, signed into law in 2021, added sesame to this list, with labeling requirements effective January 1, 2023. As per NYC Food Policy, these regulations protect consumers by ensuring clear allergen disclosures.

Even when products don’t contain allergens directly, manufacturers must warn if cross-contamination is possible, such as when processed in facilities handling allergens. These measures are crucial for consumer safety and help prevent liability in cases of allergic reactions caused by negligence.

Defective Product and Allergic Reactions

If a product is found defective due to its formulation or ingredients and causes an allergic reaction, it may provide grounds for a lawsuit. Defects can include improper manufacturing or harmful design.

Consider the Olaplex haircare range, which contains shampoos, conditioners, and treatments that promise to repair broken bonds and rejuvenate hair. As per BBC, a lawsuit alleges these products contained harmful chemicals that worsened users' hair and scalp conditions.

In response, Olaplex released test results asserting the safety of its products. However, if a defect actually causes harm, impacted customers may file a lawsuit, emphasizing the significance of holding manufacturers accountable for product safety.

Proof of Harm in Allergy Cases

To pursue a claim for an allergic reaction, you must demonstrate that the incident caused physical or mental harm. This involves providing evidence such as:

Comprehensive documentation strengthens your case and helps establish the extent of harm suffered due to the allergic reaction.

Filing Deadlines for Claims

Personal injury claims, including those related to allergic reactions, are subject to a statute of limitations, which sets a time limit for filing.

For example, in Texas, personal injury claims, including those related to allergic reactions to products, must adhere to specific filing deadlines. Medical malpractice claims are also subject to these time restrictions.

As per Investopedia, individuals generally have up to two years to file for damages for personal injury claims. This period begins either from the date of the allergic reaction or from when they discover the connection between the product and the reaction. For medical malpractice, the statute of limitations requires that claims be filed within two years of the act or omission that caused the injury.

Texas law includes a special provision for healthcare liability claims, extending the filing period in certain cases. Individuals may bring a claim up to ten years after the incident occurred. This is especially true when an injury is not readily obvious.

All in all, to protect your right to legal recourse, you must file your claim by certain timeframes. Missing the statute of limitations could stop you from seeking compensation for damages caused by an allergic response or medical malpractice.

FAQs

Q. How Are Different Types of Allergic Reactions Categorized?

A: When the body shows hypersensitivity to specific triggers, the immune response falls into four distinct categories. They are anaphylactic reactions causing immediate systemic effects, cytotoxic reactions, immunocomplex reactions, and cell-mediated responses. Each type requires specific medical intervention. This systematic categorization enables healthcare professionals to better diagnose and treat allergic conditions.

Q. How Does the FDA Classify Coconut Allergens?

A: The Food and Drug Administration officially categorizes coconut as a tree nut allergen, requiring mandatory declaration on labels. This classification creates some confusion since coconuts are botanically classified as fruits, and clinical evidence shows limited cross-reactivity between coconut and tree nut allergies.

Q. Are Work-related Allergic Reactions Covered By Workers’ Compensation?

A: Employment-related allergic reactions qualify for workers' compensation when the workplace directly causes the reaction, and the severity prevents normal work performance. Various occupational environments contain potential allergens that may trigger significant health impacts, warranting coverage under worker protection policies.

Consumer protection laws provide a framework for seeking justice after allergic reactions. However, the rising complexity of product formulations and the increasing prevalence of allergies present new legal challenges.

As seen with hair relaxer cases and emerging product liability lawsuits, the balance between innovation and consumer safety remains delicate. Ultimately, both manufacturers and consumers must remain vigilant.

Manufacturers have a duty to warn and protect, while consumers have the right to make informed choices and seek legal recourse when harmed.